| |
You can't forecast the hurricane season (Jun
2002)
This week, the following news article appeared:
"DENVER -
Hurricane expert William Gray has revised downward his forecast
for 2002 Atlantic
storms but is still calling for an above-average season.
In a report
released in April, Gray and his Colorado State University
forecast team
predicted 12 named storms and seven hurricanes, three of them
major. On Friday,
he predicted 11 named storms and six hurricanes, two of
them major.
"We still
anticipate this year's hurricane season to be reasonably active,"
Gray said. The
average per year is 9.6 named storms, 5.9 hurricanes and 2.3
major hurricanes.
Gray also said the
likelihood of a hurricane hitting the U.S. mainland is
63 percent,
compared with the average of 52 percent.
The forecast
revision is due to Atlantic surface temperatures being lower
than expected over
the past few months. A weak El Nino in the Pacific also
will inhibit
hurricane activity, said Gray.
He said it is only
a matter of time until a major storm hits the U.S.
mainland. The last
19 Atlantic basin hurricanes have not crossed the U.S.
coast -- a record.
And over the past 35 years, there has been a decrease in
the number of
major hurricanes striking the U.S. coast.
Gray, who has
become a sort of Cassandra, warning of the danger of
development along
coastlines, said, "The storms are out there, but they
have just not come
ashore. Climatological averages will eventually correct
themselves, and
when that happens, we will see a significant increase in
the number of
major hurricanes making landfall in the United States.
"With the
exploding growth in coastal populations," Gray said, "people
living on the
southeastern U.S. coastline, especially along the southern
half of the
Florida Peninsula, must be prepared in the next few decades for
landfalling
hurricanes and levels of destruction many, many times greater
than anything that
has been witnessed in the past 35 years."
For the U.S. East
Coast and Florida Peninsula, the probability of one or
more major
hurricanes making landfall this year is 42 percent. The
probability is 35
percent for the U.S. Gulf of Mexico area.
Gray and his
research team will issue one more forecast Aug. 7, before the
start of the most
active portion of the hurricane season."
Comment: I
sent this note to the bz-culture newslist on 28 Jun 2002.
I found these notes
interesting because they came from my (former) neck of the woods -- Colorado. I
am very familiar with weather forecasting in Colorado; the weather there is
about as deterministic as weather can be (which is to say...not very) But, you
can more or less count on having the same weather in Colorado that you had two
days ago in California, since weather systems travel about 500 miles a day, from
west to east. Small weather effects, like squall fronts which result from the
interaction of highs and lows, are likewise, fairly predictable because of the
geography (land is more predictable than water).
Since I'm an avid
weather buff, I began studying the weather well before I came to Belize. My
attention was captured by Mitch (3 months before we arrived) and I've been
treated to a half dozen close storms, and tracks by the dozens since then.
Here's what I've discovered:
Hurricanes arise from
extremely chaotic eddies created by the friction between the oceanic air masses
(both Atlantic and pacific) and the equatorial jet stream. (That due to the fact
that the actual velocity of air at the equator is higher than it is at northern
and southern latitudes.) In the "tropical Atlantic", as the Hurricane
Service calls it, these chaotic eddies and swirls result in weather systems
which travel "backwards" to anything a North American forecaster would
see, that is from Africa to the Caribbean. Of course, because hurricanes
are potentially disastrous, we track them very closely. However, understand that
these are tracked in real time, by radiosonde (dropped balloons) and fly-bys, or
fly-thrus. There is no vast system of weather stations such as we have in
North America.
I call these eddies
"chaotic". Well, all weather systems are chaotic, but these are much
more so, and they are also more violent. We have hurricanes; they have
"cyclones" in the US. (A cyclone is just a moving high or low.) The
thing is, the chaos and the violence combine to create conditions which
cannot be forecast at long range!!
Anyone who
claims to "forecast the hurricane season" is a fraud.
Don't take my word
for it. If you're not familiar with Chaos Theory, let me recommend Wikipedia.
Here's a quote from
"Chaos without the math.":
"Because of
the "Butterfly Effect," it is now accepted that weather forecasts
can be accurate only in the short-term, and that long-term forecasts, even
made with the most sophisticated computer methods imaginable, will always be
no better than guesses. "
Just to complicate
the situation, the measurements of El Niņo, La Niņa, and their effects (or
apparent effects) on climate have not been very good, and weather
forecasting, just like any other science, depends upon precise measurements.
My bottom line is,
almost anybody can call himself an expert, and publish something, and a bunch of
people will believe him. If he has a title, or a "Center for (fill in the
blank)" more people will believe him.
I'm not an expert.
I'm just telling you the way it is.
Sr. ric
PS: Psst! Wanta buy a
copy of the Farmer's Almanac?
|